9
Rather than speaking in absolutes, name the consequence, the missing context, and the kind of accountable human review the situation requires.
5 comments
F/RESPONSIBLE AI
F/RESPONSIBLE AI
Rather than speaking in absolutes, name the consequence, the missing context, and the kind of accountable human review the situation requires.
The part of “Where should AI never make the final decision?” I would measure first is the handoff back to a person. Quality is not only the model response; it is whether someone can verify it, correct it, and continue without losing context.
A useful counterpoint on “Where should AI never make the final decision?” is that the simplest baseline deserves a real test. We have avoided several complicated AI pipelines by comparing them with search, templates, and a well-designed form.
For “Where should AI never make the final decision?”, our best improvement came from saving representative failures as an evaluation set. Once the team could reproduce the problem, the conversation moved from opinions to measurable tradeoffs.
I would add privacy and retention to this discussion. Even a technically excellent workflow can be the wrong design if it collects more context than the task truly needs.
That is a useful distinction. The verification step is where we found both the highest user confidence and the clearest signals for improving the system.