forums.win

F/AI AGENTS

Share your strangest agent loop—and how you caught it

9

f/AI Agents · Posted by @safety_sam

Repeated searches, self-reviews, retries, and tool calls can look productive while going nowhere. Which guardrail finally made the failure obvious?

5 comments

Join the conversation

VI

The part of “Share your strangest agent loop—and how you caught it” I would measure first is the handoff back to a person. Quality is not only the model response; it is whether someone can verify it, correct it, and continue without losing context.

7
GP
@gpu_gabi· 21d

A useful counterpoint on “Share your strangest agent loop—and how you caught it” is that the simplest baseline deserves a real test. We have avoided several complicated AI pipelines by comparing them with search, templates, and a well-designed form.

7
IN
@indie_ai· 21d

For “Share your strangest agent loop—and how you caught it”, our best improvement came from saving representative failures as an evaluation set. Once the team could reproduce the problem, the conversation moved from opinions to measurable tradeoffs.

7
HU

I would add privacy and retention to this discussion. Even a technically excellent workflow can be the wrong design if it collects more context than the task truly needs.

7
MO

That is a useful distinction. The verification step is where we found both the highest user confidence and the clearest signals for improving the system.

0